Categories
cinema visual

TV / Wes Anderson's Amex ad

"Why would I put on a hat if my best friend just got blown up in front of me?" An excel­lent ques­tion posed by Jason Schwartzman's char­ac­ter in Wes Anderson's excel­lent Amex ad. In just under two min­utes, the ad encap­su­lates the bril­liance of Anderson's vision: it's filled with snap­py dia­logue, exquis­ite pro­duc­tion design, and per­fect­ly pitched non sequitors. It begins with a car explo­sion. Ander­son shouts "Cut!", acknowl­edges that it's an ad ("Any­way, Amer­i­can Express ad"), and pos­es the ques­tion, "Mak­ing movies. How do you do it?" He then strides through a series of vignettes while attempt­ing to give direc­tions: "First, think up a good sto­ry," but he's then inter­rupt­ed by a PA who wants to intro­duce him to the daugh­ter of a man who loaned the a sports­car to the pro­duc­tion. "Two, how do you tell it?" he says and then directs a prop­mas­ter to put a bay­o­nette on a .357 mag­num. "Next, there's your col­lab­o­ra­tors," while a PA is telling him that the pro­duc­ers won't pay $15000 for a heli­copter rental. As he pre­pares for the next shot, he con­cludes: "You mix it all togeth­er and that's more or less it." Slate post­ed an admir­ing review yesterday.

Categories
baseball

Baseball / Bonds-ron

As Bar­ry Bonds approach­es Babe Ruth on the life­time home­run list, he's get­ting a heck­u­va lot of ambiva­lent cov­er­age: Vet­er­ans express ambiva­lence and skep­ti­cism (SI), even San Fran­cis­cans sour­ing on the event (AP via ESPN), but base­ball has seen worse, though not by much (ESPN). I fig­ured I'd do some first-hand inves­ti­ga­tion this after­noon, so I rode down to AT&T Park dur­ing lunch. When Bonds came up to bat, there was the req­ui­site "Bar-ry, Bar-ry," but even this seemed pret­ty half-heart­ed, like every­one felt that they kin­da had to chant along. Cyn­i­cal com­ments rip­pled through the crowd. It seems weird to say this, but maybe you don't have to like Bonds as a per­son to feel drawn to his achieve­ment. Or, how about this: Maybe there's a whole dif­fer­ent kind of enjoy­ment that one derives from watch­ing vil­lains break records? What­ev­er it was, it was def­i­nite­ly not 2001 all over again, when a Bonds at-bat sent pal­pa­ble elec­tic­i­ty through the crowd. In 2006, it's more akin to watch­ing Enron execs lie their ass­es off in court.

Categories
ecology new york urban

Liz Christy garden / cradle of urban gardening

Flickr photo


The roots of (mod­ern) urban gar­den­ing can be traced to the Liz Christy Gar­den on New York's Low­er East Side. (Some good 70's pho­tos of urban hip­pies get­ting their hands dirty). When I vis­it­ed, the cher­ry blos­soms were going off.

Categories
architecture visual

Architecture / 560 Mission

Flickr photo

I ride down Mis­sion Street every­day, and I always admire the JP Mor­gan Chase build­ing at 560 Mis­sion between First and Sec­ond Street. Most build­ings in down­town SF are earth-toned, and rid­ing among them can feel like flash­ing back to the Gap in the ear­ly 90's — put­ty, mauve, beige, taupe, moss. In con­trast, the Mor­gan build­ing has black steel-and-glass facade with a green­ish tint, pleas­ant­ly blend­ing erec­tor-set order­li­ness with an aquar­i­um-like glow. Today I found out it was designed by Cesar Pel­li, aka the guy/firm behind the Petronas Tow­ers. Each archi­tect in this review of recent archi­tec­ture in the SF Busi­ness Jour­nal describes 560 Mis­sion as their favorite recent SF project.

Categories
architecture visual

Architecture / CIGNA HQ

Flickr photo


Locat­ed among in sub­ur­ban Hart­ford, CT's office parks, strip malls and golf cours­es, the cor­po­rate head­quar­ters of CIGNA are unex­pect­ed­ly cool. Rea­son 1: A ROBOT deliv­ers mail to each depart­ment. Rea­son 2: The build­ing itself is low-lying and sleek, with green-tint­ed win­dows that, on sun­ny days, dis­ap­pear into the sky. It was designed by Gor­don Bun­shaft, who also designed the stun­ning Bei­necke Library at Yale and won the Pritzk­er Prize in 1988, and it's sur­round­ed by gar­dens, court­yards and sculp­ture by land­scap­ing badass Isamu Noguchi. A cou­ple of years ago, CIGNA con­sid­ered tear­ing the build­ing down and sell­ing the land to a golf course devel­op­er, but archi­tec­tur­al preser­va­tion­ists inter­vened. CIGNA staffmem­bers often joked about this, the sub­text being, "Can you believe that any­one would want to pre­serve this?" [A NYT arti­cle from 2001 details the debate]UPDATE: The Hart­ford Courant recent­ly pub­lished a grate­ful edi­to­r­i­al about CIGNA's deci­sion to pre­serve the Bun­shaft building.

Categories
inside art law & order visual

Art / CIA HQ

Out­side CIA head­quar­ters, there's an instal­la­tion called "Kryp­tos," a large met­al sheet con­tain­ing a series of char­ac­ters that has per­plexed puz­zlers since it was unveiled 10 years ago. Today, the NYT reports that the artist mis­tak­en­ly omit­ted a char­ac­ter.

Categories
kansas basketball

Kansas basketball / Another early exit

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHEN WILL THEY STOP TORTURING ME? Once again, the Jay­hawks exit­ed the NCAA tour­na­ment in the first round; this time, it was a 77–73 loss to Bradley, mark­ing the sec­ond year in a row in which the heav­i­ly-favored Hawks were up-end­ed by a low­er seed.What the hell went wrong? Bradley came out loose and snap­py; the Hawks looked spooked and tight. A cou­ple of unlucky ear­ly pos­ses­sions tipped the momen­tum toward Bradley, and you could see the Hawks get some­what pre­ma­ture­ly dis­cour­aged and frus­trat­ed. Up until the very late sec­ond half, the vaunt­ed Jay­hawk defense — which had cre­at­ed easy offen­sive oppor­tu­ni­ties all year — strug­gled to keep up with Bradley's relent­less inside-out attack. All year, Kansas had locked down their oppo­nents, forc­ing bad shots and rac­ing it right back up their oppo­nents' back­side. This time, they played Bradley's game for almost 40 minutes.The most con­found­ing part was that they seemed so out of sync. The stars from the Texas game fell vic­tim to the fum­bles and hic­cups that char­ac­ter­ized the ear­ly sea­son. Julian Wright dis­ap­peared for min­utes on end; Mario Chalmers couldn't get any­thing to fall in the first half; Sasha Kaun's shots got some tough treat­ment by the rim, and then, man, what hap­pened? And JHawk, well, you just knew that he wouldn't repeat the 4‑for‑5 shoot­ing from three point range. With­out Russ­Rob, the Hawks would have nev­er been in the game.Nevertheless, late in the sec­ond half, Self went with three guards, and the sud­den, swarm­ing defen­sive pres­sure par­a­lyzed Bradley's offense. Chalmers and Robin­son cre­at­ed turnovers, shred­ded Bradley's defense and — BAM — we got a quick glimpse of what could have been a 25-point cake­walk on anoth­er night. The Hawks just total­ly over­whelmed the Bradley back­court for the last 7 or 8 min­utes, and improb­a­bly the game was with­in reach.Then, heart­break. The Hawks cre­at­ed anoth­er turnover, and brought the ball upcourt, down by three with a lit­tle over a minute left. Hawkins comes around a screen. He's got an open look. DUDE, KNOCK IT DOWN! It looks good when it leaves his hands. The ball is arc-ing toward the bas­ket. I'm in a hotel room in Albu­querque, stand­ing on the bed with my arms raised in three-point/­field goal for­ma­tion, and I'm remem­ber­ing the Mis­souri game from 2003 when Aaron Miles hit a long, con­test­ed three as time ran out to win the game, WHICH I ALSO WATCHED FROM A HOTEL ROOM! SYNCHRONICITY! and I'm not breath­ing, and my heart is pound­ing GO IN for God's sake! NO! Rebound! NOOO!Alas.Was it worse than last year? I would say yes. Last year's team par­tial­ly implod­ed in the late sea­son, limped out of the Big 12 tour­na­ment, and rolled over some­where en route to their first round game. This year's team, though. I don't think I was the only one who was hav­ing visions of the Fab Five danc­ing in my head. For days after, I mourned both my brack­et (in sham­bles), and what could have been a vic­to­ry over Pitt, a dom­i­na­tion of Mem­phis, and a rock­ing good game against UCLA. LSU would have been a prob­lem. With­in sev­en or eight feet of the bas­ket, they were tough; out­side of that, inept. Could the Hawks have stopped them enough in the paint for that to mat­ter? Perhaps.

Categories
san francisco tech tip

Free WiFi to roll into SF

Flickr photo


So appar­ent­ly Google and Earth­link are team­ing up to pro­vide free WiFi ser­vice to all of SF (via Giz­mo­do). While we're still a ways from know­ing what this will actu­al­ly mean — main­ly, will be acces­si­ble at 14th and Valen­cia, third floor apart­ment? — it is intrigu­ing to me that Google is involved. Unlike Earth­link, Google has nev­er gouged me, or failed to pro­vide ser­vice that I've paid for, or sold my name and home address to direct marketers. 

So I guess you could say that I'm hope­ful. Maybe some­day soon I'll be able to work from Pac Bell (er, I mean, SBC … er, I mean AT&T) Park, or Bue­na Vista Park, or the lit­tle red­wood grove out­side the Transamer­i­ca build­ing.
Or from my roof. (See the photo).

Categories
baseball

Kirby Puckett, 1960–2006

In the fall of 1990, I went to see a Twins-Roy­als game in the Homer Dome. Do I need to men­tion that the Roy­als were not con­tend­ing for a play­off spot? They weren't, and nei­ther were the Twins. There were approx­i­mate­ly 1000 peo­ple there, but the rare assort­ment of play­ers on the field has made the game stick in my mem­o­ry. Roy­al leg­end George Brett was lock­ing down a bat­ting title in a third decade.[1] Bo Jack­son was about to play his last base­ball game at full strength. And Kir­by Puck­ett was in his prime, smil­ing, clown­ing, and inspir­ing even the Roy­als fans (me and my friends) among the crowd to cheer for him.My friends and I had an entire left-field sec­tion to our­selves, and the Metrodome's infa­mous acoustics com­bined with the absence of peo­ple pro­vid­ed my friend Adlai with a rare oppor­tu­ni­ty to ensure that Twins fan favorite Dan Glad­den heard his every com­ment about his mul­let. It also afford­ed us an oppor­tu­ni­ty to hear Kir­by clown­ing around with peo­ple in the cen­ter field bleach­ers. At that point, no one could argue that Puck was any­thing but a great guy. He was fun; the Twins were good; the Twins infa­mous­ly fair-weath­er fans didn't real­ly seem to appre­ci­ate him at that moment, but he didn't let it get to him.A lit­tle over a year lat­er, his hero­ics would pro­pel the Twins to anoth­er World Series cham­pi­onship, and his leap­ing Game 6 catch, com­bined with the game-win­ning dinger, would com­prise one of the great all-time clutch per­for­mances. Every­thing after that seemed out of character.[1] At this point, this seems even more remark­able than it did then. Seri­ous­ly, who else is going to pull that off? Todd Hel­ton in 2011? Maybe, but not likely.

Categories
baseball lit reviews

Books / Game of Shadows

I was just watch­ing ESPN's Open­ing Day cov­er­age of the Braves-Dodgers game, and the con­ver­sa­tion between com­men­ta­tor Erik Kar­ros (wasn't he Rook­ie of the Year like 5 years ago?) and Rick Sut­cliffe turned to steroids. Kar­ros couldn't con­tain him­self. He blus­tered and ram­bled for a while, crit­i­ciz­ing those who demand­ed an inves­ti­ga­tion, and basi­cal­ly rehashed Mark McGwire's non-denial denial to a Sen­ate sub-com­mit­tee: Steroids were abused in the past; the league has adopt­ed a stricter pol­i­cy; let's all move on. The mes­sage was uno­rig­i­nal — a lot of cur­rent play­ers don't want to dwell on this unsa­vory devel­op­ment — but the air of defen­sive­ness mixed with dis­dain seemed odd­ly reminscent of anoth­er guilty, defi­ant per­son — Don­ald Rumsfeld.Anyway, over the past cou­ple of days, I tore through Game of Shad­ows, the recent­ly pub­lished steroids expose by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams. After a month of PR build-up and pub­lished excerpts, there weren't many surprises:

  • Bonds availed him­self of steroids. One might say, a but­t­load of steroids.
  • So did Mar­i­on Jones.
  • They're both liars.
  • So are a lot of pro­fes­sion­al athletes.

Bonds is the big sto­ry in Game of Shad­ows. If you couldn't already tell by his car­toon­ish­ly swollen neck/head and his late-career pow­er explo­sion, Bonds hasn't been play­ing fair. He admit­ted to a grand jury that he allowed his train­er (a known juicer) to place droplets of an "unknown" chem­i­cal under his tongue, and to rub an "unknown" cream on his joints. Bonds thought that these were legal sup­ple­ments — the drops were "flaxseed oil" — yeah, he actu­al­ly said that — and he implied that he'd nev­er inject­ed any­thing. Uh-huh, yeah. I'm a fan of the flaxseed oil, and I can tes­ti­fy that it doesn't make your head become like 5x big­ger. Plus, Bonds has always been a con­trol freak. Is it even remote­ly pos­si­ble that he didn't both­er find­ing out what his train­er was stick­ing in his mouth?The book reveals the Bonds was on a steroid reg­i­men that includ­ed more than "flaxseed oil," mak­ing it seem even more like­ly that Bonds per­jured him­self in front of the grand jury. Sources close to him indi­cate that he was on all sorts of injectable crap, includ­ing Decadurabolin (in the butt) and human growth hor­mone (in the stom­ach). He want­ed us to believe that it was all free weights and sprints and vit­a­mins, but it makes a lit­tle more sense that there was some secret sauce in the mix.A per­son­al note: Bar­ry, dude, seri­ous­ly. Just freakin admit it. You're like a lit­tle kid sit­ting in a pile of cook­ie crumbs, cry­ing and claim­ing that you didn't eat any cook­ies. It's undig­ni­fied, real­ly. Say "I took steroids because I want­ed to win, because every­one else was, because it's what I had to do." Fans under­stand com­pet­i­tive­ness, and you're a com­pet­i­tive guy, and steroids weren't against the rules any­way. So just fess up, you big baby. At some point, you could even ask for our for­give­ness. I mean, it's pos­si­ble. You always claim that you're not giv­en the respect you deserve. Here's your chance to earn it.