In a previous post, I suggested that the Kansas defense must "contain" Kevin Durant, thereby implying that Kevin Durant could, in fact, be contained. I said: "he's going to get 10–15 points no matter what you do," and anything in excess of that was a matter of the opposing team's defense shutting him down. Against Kansas on Saturday, he rattled off 12 points in a row between the 17:41 and the 14:14 marks in the first half, and had 20 points just five minutes later. (Thanks to ESPN's play-by-play for this). And it wasn't like the Texas offense was getting him a lot of open looks: He was burying every shot, no matter who was guarding him and no matter where he was on the court. 22 feet away, Julian Wright's hand in his face: Rattled in. Pulling up from 27 feet at the tail end of a fast break: Swish. Texas didn't even need to run an offense, they just needed to get him the ball and then worry about getting back and playing defense. In the first half, this worked. In the second half, different story. Two things changed (at least): Brandon Rush was on Durant, rather than Julian Wright. It was hard to say whether Durant just cooled off, or whether Rush cooled him off, but the fact was that he missed 4 of 5 shots before going down with a twisted ankle. Second thing: Another player immediately double-teamed Durant on the perimeter whenever he got the ball, and Texas failed to exploit this for easy low-post baskets. (Nice call by Coach Self. Not sure why he didn't go to this earlier, but I'm just glad that it worked). At the same time, I can't believe Texas couldn't exploit this. I mean, teams must be doing this all the time. Why weren't they able to find Damian James for easy baskets underneath, or Augustin on cuts to the basket? (I share Bill Simmons's assessment of Texas coach Rick Barnes, by the way: "How can you not run more plays for Kevin Durant? Post him up and he has 27 different ways to score. Curl him off picks and he makes 15-footers like they're layups.") Speaking of bad coaching, I was mystified that Texas didn't start fouling sooner. Kansas wasn't even in the bonus until the 2:20 mark, and Texas didn't start fouling until the 1:18 mark when they were down by 8. RussRob missed the front-end of a one-and-one, and Texas cut the lead to 6. Then, on consecutive possessions, Mario makes one of two; RussRob makes one of two; Julian makes one of two. HEART ATTACK TIME. Instead of a 6‑point lead, it's a 3‑point lead, and Texas has a chance to tie. This is a huge, huge issue going into the post-season, both for the Hawks chances and my own physical and mental health.Incidentally, with this in mind, I deeply enjoyed a recent piece by Gene Weingarten about FT shooting: "If I took a year off and practiced all day, every day, I could then defeat the NBA's best free-throw shooter in head-to-head competition" (via kottke).
Category: kansas basketball
Rock, chalk, and other matters pertaining to Kansas Jayhawk basketball.
Watching the Longhorns repeatedly (and ultimately successfully) drive a stake into the heart of Acie Law IV last night, I got to thinking about Saturday's showdown between the Longhorns and the Hawks. (I also penciled in A&M for the Final Four. Is there any team in the nation — other than UCLA, I guess — that has such a perfect blend of March-ready qualities — go-to guy, great defense, grit, gumption? Totally g'ed up). Anyway, here's the big stuff that KU has to address:Contain Kevin Durant. I know, I know. Obvious. Duh. Everyone tries to do this. But I think Kansas has a chance to succeed. Yes, he's going to get 10–15 points no matter what you do. He'll be everywhere — around the basket, out on the perimeter, getting put-backs, rolling off picks and taking jumpers. The challenge for the Hawks is to make sure he doesn't get 30–35, to limit the number of open looks he gets on the perimeter, and to make sure that he doesn't get anywhere near a rhythm like he had against Texas Tech (37 points, 23 rebounds). Durant thrives when teams don't have someone who can get in his face when he's away from the basket. At 6'9", he's going to shoot over the kind of guy who will take away the drive, but he's also fast and agile enough to go around most guys his size. All of that said, I think he's going to have problems with KU's long, fast, and highly disruptive defenders — Julian Wright and Brandon Rush. I think it's totally possible for them to contain him, as long as they stay out of foul trouble. Disrupt the supply chain. DJ Augustin kept them in the game last night when Durant went into a funk. In many games this year, I've seen him slice through defenses, get to the basket, and generally create the kind of chaos that leads to easy put-backs for Durant. Mario Chalmers, Russell Robinson, and Sherron Collins have to keep him from driving, and complicate his distribution of the ball. Run them ragged, and don't get beat by AJ Abrams. Or anyone like him. Last year, the relatively quiet Abrams exploded for four three-pointers during a first half run, singlehandedly demoralizing the Hawks. The good news is that, this year, the Longhorn weaponry is far from secret. Abrams, Augustin and Durant play pretty much all game, every game. This is an opportunity for the relatively deep Hawks to be relentless in their defense — Maybe even press a little? C'mon, Coach. Gimmick defenses have stunned KU twice recently (A&M, OU). Why not break one out once in a while? Making free throws. The mere thought that this game will come down to free throws makes my stomach hurt. The last five minutes of the Oklahoma game was excruciating in that it almost turned into A&M, Part II. Unfortunately, it's no secret that Kansas can't shoot free throws. They're going to get fouled late in the game; with any luck, Chalmers and Robinson will control the ball and hit their freebies.Lastly, Collins and Arthur must contribute, and Rush has to get his shots. It's pretty amazing that the Hawks could get by OU without contributions from any of these guys, but there's no way that a win versus Texas is possible without them.
After the loss to A&M, I jotted down some notes that I titled "Resolved & Unresolved." In the subsequent five games, there has been a migration of some items from one list to the other, mostly in the direction of resolution, which is nice.
Resolved
- Rotation. Coach Self seems like he's found the right starters, and his bench guys inject energy almost every time. This was not the case last year, and even earlier this year, when Kaun, Jackson, Wright and Hawkins (last year) were in and out of his doghouse and the starting lineup. I'm not getting too excited about this, because it's one of the more elementary requirements for any deep advancement in the tournament.
- Pace. During Self's first year, it was clear that Miles, Langford, and Simien all struggled with his insistence on cohesive half-court defense, which prevented a lot of the sprinting out that characterized Roy's offense (and probably was a major part of why those guys came to KU). Langford especially seemed to struggle when he wasn't getting multiple opportunities for (relatively) easy transition baskets. This year's team seems to have fully embraced Self's approach, while also running a pretty mean fast break when they get the opportunity.
- Defense. It's Coach Self's calling card, and it ensures that KU is competitive in every game. There isn't a team in the country right now who has a definitive answer to it; I say this with confidence because Florida is really the only team that would appear to be dominant, and we all know what happened there.
- Bench. A newly resolved matter, thanks to both Sherron Collins and Shady (whose huge rebounds late in the K‑State game allowed KU to steadily pull away). Darnell Jackson is always solid, and occasionally he is a total badass. Watching him tearing shit off the glass and kicking it out to RussRob is a comforting sight, especially when Kaun and Shady seem to have so much trouble laying down the law in the paint.
Unresolved
- The go-to guy. Yes, Collins has emerged as a major late-game threat. Is he a true go-to guy yet, though? I'm not sure. Coach Self gave him the ball in last possession of the A&M game, rather than Chalmers, Rush, or Wright, so clearly the staff believes that Collins can do it. He's got the moxie, not to mention the game, for making big plays late in the game, but the reason that I think that this is still unresolved is that, usually, when you've got a go-to guy, the rest of the team seems relaxed and comfortable, and this comfort translates into wins in close games. Thus far, I seen very little comfort during close games (a la Missouri, Iowa State, A&M, Texas Tech). I started to see more of it during K‑State, but it still took some luck — Rush's three-point play after Julian's terrible no-look somehow skittered through four K‑State defenders — and some K‑State mistakes in order for KU to escape with a win. Nevertheless, this is getting better, no question. What needs to happen: Kansas needs to win an A&M‑style game, a down-to-the-wire game in which the other team keeps bringing it (like Florida), and in that game the go-to guy needs to execute on every possession, like Acie Law of A&M did.
- Post play. If this team didn't rely on scoring in the post, I'd say that Sasha Kaun has been pretty solid. He rarely makes a bad pass; he picks up the occasional stupid foul (but seems to be getting better in this regard); he establishes position well and draws defenders. Defensively, he's rarely out of position. Little of this ever makes it on a stat sheet, and all of it contributes to open looks for other players on the offensive end, and fewer opportunities for the opponent on the defensive end. So he's solid, except for the fact that he becomes offensively inept at really inopportune times. It's hard to ignore the many, many occasions when he has failed to finish the bunnies; if he gets fouled, we all know what we're in for. Shady, on the other hand, simply needs to get hungry. All of the tools are there; they just need to be brought to bear with a little passion. Not that I'm going to make any Rudy Gay comparisons. There's no way that Self would ever allow Shady to conduct himself with the nonchalance that Gay routinely brought to UConn. What needs to happen: Shady needs to show more of what he showed against K‑State; Kaun needs to convert his easy baskets; Jackson needs to keep doing what he does.
- Easy baskets. Free throws fall into this category; so do layups. I've never seen a team blow so many open, close range buckets, or brick as many FTs. Jackson and Kaun are approaching Richard Scott-level incompetence in this regard, and even Chalmers and RussRob (admittedly, my favorite of the current Hawks, esp. after he got in Cartier Martin's face during the K‑State game) isn't 100% reliable down the stretch. And Rush missed the two FT's after Huggy's T, which could have put KU up by 7. (Good thing Collins hit a three in the ensuing possession). Anyway, one virtue of Roy's teams is that they seem to get 10–15 easy baskets every game: fast break layups and dunks; post guys who get sprung open by a back screen; open jumpers for the big guys trailing the fast break. Self's teams must get fewer of these looks, which may be okay since they seem to have trouble converting them anyway. What needs to happen: It may be impossible for this team to become a good FT-shooting team, but it's eminently possible for them to make layups, especially Kaun.
Question: What happens when a young college basketball team without a proven low-post presence somehow manages to secure a high national ranking then faces a really hungry, experienced team? The Hawks found out two nights ago, getting their rear-ends tanned by an unheralded and obviously hungry Oral Roberts team.Where does this rank among the hardest-to-swallow losses in recent memory? I don't want to go overboard here; it's not as crushing as the two NCAA Tournament early exits. It also wasn't as demoralizing as losing to K‑State (at home) and Missouri (after leading by 7 with a little over a minute left) last year. It's most reminscent of the 2004 home loss to Richmond, when the entire sporting nation could turn on ESPN to see the Hawks implode on their home floor to a team that wasn't even playing that well. ESPN didn't carry the ORU game on Wednesday night, THANK GOD, but the loss rippled through the sports press in a way that always seemed to emphasize the Hawks simply failed to look, umm, good. SI said simply: "Oral Roberts outplayed No. 3 Kansas the whole way."Question: How in the world does SI rank KU above a team like Florida, the defending national champions who returned every starter from last year? Did they want to avoid jinxing Florida for some reason? (SI added KU to its list of cover jinxes). Maybe they settled on this arrangement before Sasha Kaun got hurt, and before CJ Giles pulled a Lawrence Phillips and got himself kicked off the team?[1] Even so, how does any front line arrangement compete with Gator paint-dominators Al Horford and Joakim Noah? We'll find out soon enough, I guess, since the teams will meet a week from tomorrow in Vegas. Gulp.[1] Wikipedia's abstract on Lawrence Phillips: "Lawrence Phillips (b. May 12, 1975 in Little Rock, Arkansas), is a former professional American football and Canadian football running back who has had numerous conflicts with law enforcement." Sorta says it all.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHEN WILL THEY STOP TORTURING ME? Once again, the Jayhawks exited the NCAA tournament in the first round; this time, it was a 77–73 loss to Bradley, marking the second year in a row in which the heavily-favored Hawks were up-ended by a lower seed.What the hell went wrong? Bradley came out loose and snappy; the Hawks looked spooked and tight. A couple of unlucky early possessions tipped the momentum toward Bradley, and you could see the Hawks get somewhat prematurely discouraged and frustrated. Up until the very late second half, the vaunted Jayhawk defense — which had created easy offensive opportunities all year — struggled to keep up with Bradley's relentless inside-out attack. All year, Kansas had locked down their opponents, forcing bad shots and racing it right back up their opponents' backside. This time, they played Bradley's game for almost 40 minutes.The most confounding part was that they seemed so out of sync. The stars from the Texas game fell victim to the fumbles and hiccups that characterized the early season. Julian Wright disappeared for minutes on end; Mario Chalmers couldn't get anything to fall in the first half; Sasha Kaun's shots got some tough treatment by the rim, and then, man, what happened? And JHawk, well, you just knew that he wouldn't repeat the 4‑for‑5 shooting from three point range. Without RussRob, the Hawks would have never been in the game.Nevertheless, late in the second half, Self went with three guards, and the sudden, swarming defensive pressure paralyzed Bradley's offense. Chalmers and Robinson created turnovers, shredded Bradley's defense and — BAM — we got a quick glimpse of what could have been a 25-point cakewalk on another night. The Hawks just totally overwhelmed the Bradley backcourt for the last 7 or 8 minutes, and improbably the game was within reach.Then, heartbreak. The Hawks created another turnover, and brought the ball upcourt, down by three with a little over a minute left. Hawkins comes around a screen. He's got an open look. DUDE, KNOCK IT DOWN! It looks good when it leaves his hands. The ball is arc-ing toward the basket. I'm in a hotel room in Albuquerque, standing on the bed with my arms raised in three-point/field goal formation, and I'm remembering the Missouri game from 2003 when Aaron Miles hit a long, contested three as time ran out to win the game, WHICH I ALSO WATCHED FROM A HOTEL ROOM! SYNCHRONICITY! and I'm not breathing, and my heart is pounding GO IN for God's sake! NO! Rebound! NOOO!Alas.Was it worse than last year? I would say yes. Last year's team partially imploded in the late season, limped out of the Big 12 tournament, and rolled over somewhere en route to their first round game. This year's team, though. I don't think I was the only one who was having visions of the Fab Five dancing in my head. For days after, I mourned both my bracket (in shambles), and what could have been a victory over Pitt, a domination of Memphis, and a rocking good game against UCLA. LSU would have been a problem. Within seven or eight feet of the basket, they were tough; outside of that, inept. Could the Hawks have stopped them enough in the paint for that to matter? Perhaps.
I have irrational feelings about Kansas basketball, and this entry is a simple effort to contextualize and provide foundation for comments I will make as the 2005–6 season unfolds.I grew up in Kansas. My grandfather, great-grandfather, dad, uncle, and aunt all attended the University of Kansas. My family had season tickets for both football and basketball games, and I spent a sizeable chunk of my childhood running around those stadiums. At football games, we sat on the 50-yard line, about 30 rows up from the field. For basketball, we sat courtside — second row, actually — behind the Kansas bench, Jack Nicholson-style.Any fan of college sports will tell you that season tickets to Kansas football have never been in high demand, at least not in my lifetime. The last glory year for Kansas football was 1969, when they were edged 15–14 by Penn State in the Orange Bowl. My dad traveled to Miami for that game, and the story of profound heartbreak still stings, even though I wasn't there. The basketball Jayhawks had hay days in the fifties, again, well before my time, winning a national championship in 1952 and coming up one point short of another in a classic 1957 duel with North Carolina.All of this began to change in 1984, when journeyman genius Larry Brown was hired as head basketball coach. He had not yet attained the status of wizard as he seems to have today, but Brown converted a team that had been run into the ground in the early 80's into a national title winner in the span of five years. The aftermath of his tenure wasn't pretty: he took a job with the LA Clippers after the title game and left KU to deal with the graduation of one a Jayhawk great (Danny Manning), and, umm, some NCAA sanctions that resulted in a year-long suspension from the NCAA tournament. The future looked bleak in 1989, even more so when the athletic department hired a relatively unknown North Carolina assistant named Roy Williams.As it turned out, 1989 was merely the beginning of a 15-year run of basketball excellence. Salad years. Coach Williams proved to be an unquestionable master of the college game (an encyclopedic account of his achievements), patching together the team that remained after Brown's exit and leading them into the Final Four within two years and in the process creating a new style of offense that proudly bears the name, The Kansas Break. Accolades accumulated: Final Fours in 1991 and 1993. A nationally-televised 150–95 drubbing of Kentucky in 1989. One of the all-time great college basketball teams in 1996. More Final Fours in 2002 and 2003.When Coach Williams returned home to North Carolina after the 2003 season, the question on everyone's mind was: Will 2003 be looked at as another 1989, or as another 1969? The beginning of a new era of greatness, or the beginning of a long decline?